Media centre

Click here to return to the media centre

Risk Mitigation Begins with Environmental Expertise

Alan Robertson, Managing Director - RGS Environmental Consultants 


The mining industry is at an inflection point. Tightening regulatory frameworks and an increasingly fragile social licence to operate are reshaping the boardroom agenda. Investor scrutiny of environmental performance is no longer a peripheral consideration it is a core requirement.

The organisations navigating this landscape most successfully treat the environment (and environmental geochemistry) as more than a compliance requirement. They embed environmental outcomes into projects from the start—informing mine planning, waste scheduling, water management and design, and streamline rehabilitation and closure strategies—resulting in better outcomes and reduced long-term liability.

When the environment and mine rehabilitation and closure is treated as an afterthought and spending is deferred until mine closure, companies accumulate risks they may not yet fully appreciate. These are significant financial and reputational risks with that can define a company's legacy and access to future projects.

By incorporating a range of technical assessments early in the mine life, mine operators have significantly more management options to improve environmental outcomes and reduce operating and closure costs. Some of these technical assessments include: mine waste geochemical characterisation, mine waste and water management, predictive water quality modelling, contaminant transport modelling, data management, landform and cover design.

The opportunity is clear. Engaging environmental (geochemistry) expertise from the outset is not a great cost when compared to exploration drilling and project evaluation —it is risk mitigation. It increasingly determines the projects secure capital, maintain social licence to operate, and close leaving a positive legacy and enhanced reputation for environmental stewardship.

The question for every mining executive is straightforward: is your organisation using leading practice environmental geochemistry, or reacting to problems as they arise?